Y. D. V. D. Arts, Commerce & Science College, Tiosa

Criterion VI

Criterion VI - Governance, Leadership and Management
In charge: Dr. N.R.Giri
Contact No: 8830022748
E-Mail id: neeta.giri27@gmail.com
Designation: Assistant Professor in Home Economics

Question No.	Question	Data Template	View Documents	Any other information
6.1.1	The governance of the institution is reflective of and in tune with the vision and mission of the institution		View	View
6.1.2	The effective leadership is visible in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management		View	View
6.2.1	The institutional Strategic / Perspective plan is effectively deployed		View	View
6.2.2	The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules, procedures, etc.		View	View
6.2.3	Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation 1.Administration 2.Finance and Accounts 3.Student Admission and Support 4.Examination	View	View	View
6.3.1	The institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff		View
6.3.2	Average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years		View	View
6.3.3	Average number of professional development /administrative training programs organized by the institution for teaching and non-teaching staff during the last five years	View	View	View
6.3.4	Average percentage of teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes (FDP) during the last five years (Professional Development Programmes, Orientation / Induction Programmes, Refresher Course, Short Term Course).	View	View	View
6.3.5	Institutions Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff		View	View
6.4.1	Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly		View	View
6.4.2	Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropers during the last five years (not covered in Criterion III)	View	View	View
6.4.3	Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources		View	View
6.5.1	Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes		View	View
6.5.2	The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per norms and recorded the incremental improvement in various activities ( For first cycle - Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality For second and subsequent cycles - Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality and post accreditation quality initiatives )		View	View
6.5.3	Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include: 1.Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); Feedback collected, analysed and used for improvements 2.Collaborative quality intitiatives with other institution(s) 3.Participation in NIRF 4.any other quality audit recognized by state, national or international agencies (ISO Certification, NBA)		View	View